SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL of the Hungarian Society of Cardiology

The year 2017 in cardiology: aorta and peripheral circulation

█ Current opinion

Authors:
Victor Aboyans1,2*, Sigrid Braekkan3, Lucia Mazzolai4, Henrik Sillesen5, Maarit Venermo6 and Marco De Carlo7; on behalf of the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases
1Department of Cardiology, Dupuytren University Hospital
2Martin Luther King Ave., Limoges, France; Inserm 1094, Limoges School of Medicine, Ave Dr. Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France;
3K.G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center (TREC), Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 18, 9037, Tromsø, Norway;
4Division of Angiology, Department of Heart and Vessel, Lausanne University Hospital, Ch du Mont-Paisible 18, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland;
5Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark;
6Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland;
7Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Azienda Ospealiero-Universitaria Pisana, via Paradisa, Pisa, Italy

Preamble

More than 83 million people live with cardiovascular (CV) disease in the ESC member countries, with peripheral vascular diseases as the most predominant condition (more than 35 million) followed by ischaemic heart disease (>29 million), underlining the public health burden of the former in our continent (1).

The ESC collaborated with European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) to publish the most comprehensive guidelines document on the management of peripheral arterial diseases (PADs), encompassing all the peripheral territories (2). Compared to the 2011 version, major changes regard risk stratification for patients with asymptomatic carotid disease, and those with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), and a new specific chapter on cardiac diseases in patients with PADs. Any presentation of PADs is associated with a very high risk for CV events, and all patients require best medical therapy for secondary prevention. In this respect, the VIVA (3) and COMPASS (4) trials are definitely the two seminal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the year.

The VIVA trial demonstrated the interest of multiple vascular screening to improve population longevity (Table 1) (3). Over 50,000 Danish men were randomized to receive an invitation for vascular screening or not. Vascular screening consisted of arm blood pressure and ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement, and abdominal aorta ultrasound. Positive cases were invited to consult their general practitioners, while large abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA) were referred to vascular surgeons. After 4.4 years, the mortality was significantly lower in the screening group (Table 1). The number needed to screen to prevent one death was 169, far below the one necessary for any cancer screening.

The COMPASS trial randomized 27,395 patients either with coronary artery disease (CAD) or PADs [lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) or carotid stenosis or prior carotid revascularization] to three different antithrombotic strategies. In the pre-defined sub-analysis of patients with PADs, the results were consistent with those obtained in the entire population (Table 1): the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. + aspirin 100 mg was associated with a significant 28% reduction of a combination of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and a 46% reduction of major adverse limb events (MALE), including amputation, as compared to aspirin 100 mg (4). Bleeding events were higher under the combination therapy, except for fatal bleeding. The net benefit including ischaemic and major bleeding events remained in favour of the combination strategy. The clinical implication for the management of these patients needs further analyses to select specific subgroups with an optimal benefit/risk ratio (RR). Also, the external applicability of these results is important; among REACH participants with LEAD, 68% were COMPASS-compatible, fulfilling inclusion, and exclusion criteria (15). The main reason for not being COMPASS-compatible was a high-bleeding risk. Hence, the bleeding risk stratification is of paramount importance.

ISSUE: CARDIOLOGIA HUNGARICA | 2018 | VOLUME 48, ISSUE 3

Other specific studies in lower-extremity artery disease

The 2017 ESC guidelines (1) emphasize the optimal management of risk factors in patients with PADs. A new analysis of the FOURIER trial underscored the importance of lowering LDL-cholesterol in patients with LEAD, with significant benefits with evolocumab, a PCSK-9 inhibitor (Table 1) (7). This new analysis in patients with LEAD showed similar benefits in terms of CV events reduction, and a significant reduction of MALE. This is the first trial showing the benefits of a lipid-lowering drug to reduce MALE, including amputation.

Many patients with LEAD are diabetic. Recently strikingly positive results on the CV benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2-inhibitors have been presented, although concerns were raised regarding the increased risk of amputation (mostly minor) with canaglifozin (16). A new analysis of patients with LEAD enrolled in the EMPA-REG trial confirmed the benefits of empagliflozin in terms of mortality and CV events (Table 1), without any difference in amputation rates as compared to placebo (6). The need for improved diabetes care was underlined by a recent registry on 15,332 CLTI patients (47% diabetic), showing that in spite of a 60% higher risk of infection and 40% higher amputation rate (both in-hospital and at 4-year follow-up), diabetic patients were revascularized less often (46% vs. 54%, P < 0.001) (17).
In another review of 60,998 hospitalizations of patients undergoing revascularization or amputation in the USA for CLTI, the 30-days readmission rate was 20%, mainly due to infections, persistent CLTI symptoms, cardiac conditions, and procedural complications (18).

Regarding revascularization, the Iliac, Common and External Artery Stent Trial (ICE) is the first RCT to compare balloon-expandable (BES) vs. self-expandable stents (SES) (8). Among 660 patients undergoing iliac stenting, 1-year binary restenosis was significantly lower after SES as compared to BES (Table 1). Furthermore, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) was higher in the SES group, with no difference in peri-procedural complications or functional outcome. At the femoro-popliteal level, new evidence regarding device choice came from a network meta-analysis (6091 patients) (19). Five endovascular strategies were compared: bare metal stent (BMS), covered metal stent (CMS), drug-eluting stent (DES), drug-coated balloon (DCB), and plain balloon angioplasty (PTA). Drug-coated balloon, DES, and CMS offered a significant reduction in 1-year TLR vs. PTA (68%, 58%, and 48%, respectively). Additionally, DCB significantly reduced TLR also vs. BMS (53%), appearing the preferable revascularization device. The advantages of DCB were confirmed in ISAR-STATH, an RCT randomizing 155 patients to three different strategies: DCB + BMS, PTA + BMS, or directional atherectomy (9). The primary endpoint was significantly lower for DCB + BMS than PTA + BMS, as well as 2-year TLR (Table 1). Further evidence favouring DCB over PTA comes from the ILLUMENATE pivotal (10) and ILLUMENATE EU (11) which randomized 300 and 222 patients, respectively, to DCB or PTA; primary patency was significantly higher for DCB in both trials (Table 1).

Cardiac risk should be assessed in patients undergoing vascular surgery (2). In a nationwide US registry of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, peri-operative myocardial infarction occurred in 2% of patients with vascular surgery, among the highest risks compared to other types of non-cardiac intervention [odds ratio (OR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.52–1.59] (20). Through a propensity-matched analysis, the registry suggests that invasive management of peri-operative myocardial infarction would improve outcomes; this deserves a trial enrolling patients with PADs.

Carotid artery disease

Optimal medical management
Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis should benefit from best medical therapy (1). This has recently been confirmed in 864 patients with 50–69% or 70–99% carotid artery stenosis (21). Altogether, 4929 carotid ultrasound studies were performed on 1439 carotid arteries over 6.5 years. Ischaemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and carotid revascularization occurred in 12.2% and progression of the stenosis in 21.5% of patients. The quality of risk factors control were independent predictors for the stenosis progression or occurrence of stroke/TIA (Figure 1) (21).

Revascularization
A meta-analysis of five RCTs including 3019 asymptomatic patients compared carotid artery stenting (CAS) to surgery (CEA) (5). After CAS, the risk of any peri-procedural stroke and non-disabling stroke as well as the composite of any peri-procedural stroke or death was increased with borderline statistical significance (Table 1). There was a trend for less peri-procedural myocardial infarctions after CAS. There was no significant difference regarding incident long-term stroke between the two techniques.

Women are at increased risk of peri-operative stroke, but gender-specific data are sparse. In the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (5620 CEA and 141 CAS), the early post-operative outcomes in women with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were compared. During the first 30 days, MACE occurred in 12.2% and 5.2%, respectively after CAS and CEA (P < 0.001) (22). In a propensity-matched analysis including 125 pairs, the 30-day incidence of post-operative MACE in the CAS group was 11.2% vs. 4.0% after CEA (OR: 2.8; P = 0.04). This is in favour of CEA as the preferred option in women.

Early revascularization after an ischaemic stroke/TIA is recommended in case of carotid stenosis, but the influence of the timing on revascularization techniques has been poorly studied. In a pooled analysis of individual data of 4138 patients from four RCTs, the risk of stroke or death after CAS was higher than after CEA in those treated within 7 days (8.3% vs. 1.3%, RR 6.7; 95% CI: 2.1–21.9, adjusted for age, sex, and type of qualifying event) (23). These results favour of CEA in the early days after a neurologic ischaemic event.

In a German registry (2009–14), a total of 13,086 CAS procedures were analysed (24). In-hospital stroke or death occurred in 2.4% (1.7% in asymptomatic and 3.7% in symptomatic patients). The multivariable analysis showed the use of an embolic protection device was an independent predictor of lower in-hospital rates of stroke or death (adjusted RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50–0.85), major stroke or death (adjusted RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43–0.84), and stroke (adjusted RR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43–0.77). This supports the recent recommendations in favour of embolic protection device during CAS (2).

Current practice of carotid revascularization was evaluated in 12 countries (25). Among 58,607 treated cases, the largest national and international variation was seen in indications: overall, about half of the patients were asymptomatic (48%), but this varied from 0% (Denmark) to 73% (Italy). National variation between centres was even bigger and was the highest in Australia (0–72%), Hungary (5–55%), and the USA (0–100%). The odds for revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis were much higher in countries where fee per case is paid to the operator (OR 5.8, 95% CI 4.4–7.7). Among asymptomatic patients CAS was used most often in Sweden (26%) while some countries (Finland, Iceland) did not use CAS at all. An international effort is necessary to homogenize guidelines and practices globally.

Aorta

Thoracic aorta
Echocardiography remains the most frequent imaging method to assess the proximal aorta. The diameter varies according to the cardiac cycle, site, and mode of measurement as well as age and body size. In the multicentre collaborative NORRE study including more than 700 healthy individuals, the normal reference ranges for the proximal aorta dimensions have been set (26).

Two studies from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis reported on aortic calcification on computed tomography (CT): the first assessed the ascending aorta calcium and showed that this condition is rare in general population (3.4%) (27). The ascending aorta calcium density was inversely correlated with CV events, even after adjustments for risk factors and the coronary artery calcium. The second study focused on those with coronary artery calcium score of zero and found no additional prognostic information from ascending aorta calcium (28). A magnetic resonance imaging study showed the prognostic interest of the aortic arch pulse-wave velocity, a marker of aortic stiffness, in middle-age (45–54 years) subjects, but not at older ages (29).

Regarding aortic events, so far only the aortic diameter is considered as a risk marker from imaging for aortic dissection. Two independent case-control studies, comparing patients with type-B aortic dissection (TB-AD) with controls, suggest that beyond the diameter, the age-related elongation of the aortic arch is also associated with increased risk of TB-AD (30, 31).

Abdominal aorta
After screening, small AAAs require follow-up of the diameter, typically assessed by 2D ultrasound (US). Using 3D-US for assessment of AAA volume in 179 patients with small AAAs, it was found that 3D-US was accurate in assessing both diameter and volume as compared to CT (32). During follow-up, 40% patients classified as stable according to the diameter actually presented a volume growth highlighting the higher sensitivity of this new method.

Data from one of the most comprehensive and nationwide registries in Europe come from Finland, showing the improvement in the prognosis of patients with unruptured and ruptured AAA during the last 2 decades (Figure 2) (33). The VascuNet network analysed differences in AAA interventional methods and outcomes in 83,253 patients through 11 countries during the 2005–09 and 2010–13 periods (34). The proportion of octogenarians operated increased between the two periods from 18.5% to 23.1% (P < 0.0001) and similarly the proportion of patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increased from 44.3% to 60.6% (P < 0.0001). Mortality for EVAR decreased from 1.5% to 1.1% (P < 0.0001), but the outcome worsened for open repair from 3.9% to 4.4% (P = 0.008).

In some countries, AAAs are repaired by EVAR at a lower diameter than recommended in guidelines. Based on data from almost 40,000 Medicare patients undergoing EVAR from 2001 to 2008, earlier AAA repair by 5 mm has major consequences, with 22% excess EVAR procedures and 42% and 37% increase in open and endovascular re-interventions (35). The cost per saved AAA rupture was estimated to be 1 million USD.

After EVAR lifelong surveillance is necessary and CT-angiography has been the preferred modality, while ultrasound duplex scanning (DUS) with and without contrast enhancement (CEUS) is an alternative. A Cochrane review of 42 studies (36) concluded that both DUS and CEUS a have high specificity for identification of endoleaks; however, CEUS is more sensitive and can be routinely used, with CT scan only when endoleak is suspected.

Venous thromboembolism

After an acute episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) anticoagulation is indicated for at least 3 months (37). Optimal anticoagulation duration, beyond the initial period remains uncertain. Prandoni et al. showed that anticoagulation in patients with a first episode of proximal DVT, based on the assessment of residual vein thrombosis and serial D-dimer, leads to an overall annual rate of recurrent VTE <5% (38). However, in men this strategy needs further assessment. Several prediction rules are proposed to identify patients at high risk of recurrence (39). The REVERSE II study prospectively validated the ‘men continue and HERDOO2’ clinical prediction rule (40). This allows identifying low-risk women, following a first unprovoked VTE, who can safely discontinue anticoagulation once the initial treatment is completed (3.0% recurrence per patient-year in low-risk women). No predictors for low risk of recurrence were found in men. The decision on whether to discontinue anticoagulation should therefore be individually tailored and balanced against bleeding risk.
Once the decision to extend anticoagulant treatment is taken, common agreement is to continue with the initial compound. The latest EINSTEIN-CHOICE trial (12) showed that standard (20 mg o.d.) and lower dose rivaroxaban (10 mg o.d.), significantly reduced the risk of recurrence compared to aspirin, without significant increase in bleeding rates (Table 1).

In patients with proximal DVT treated with DOACs, persistence of residual vein thrombosis is likely to occur less frequently than in patients treated with conventional anticoagulation. These results may have implications for the prognosis of patients with DVT (41).

According to current guidelines, adjuvant catheter-directed thrombolysis may be considered in selected patients with acute ilio-femoral DVT, if performed in experienced centres, to diminish risk of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). However, the recently published ATTRACT trial (692 patients) failed to show the additional interest of catheter-directed thrombolysis to decrease the risk of PTS, but did result in a higher risk of major bleeding (13). While the PTS severity score was lower in the pharmacomechanical group, this did not affect improve the quality of life of the patients. There was no difference according to the site of DVT (57% had ilio-femoral DVT). The overall results are in contradiction with a smaller trial reported previously in favour of pharmacomechanical intervention, with decreased risk of PTS after 5 years of follow-up (42). Further trials, focused on ilio-femoral DVT, are required.

The clinical usefulness of VTE risk prediction scores in ambulatory cancer patients is debated. A cohort of 876 cancer patients compared several scores (Table 2) (43). All models performed poorly (c-statistics: 0.50–0.57), indicating the need for improvements before these models can be considered in clinical practice. Identifying predictors for VTE recurrence in cancer patients remains a challenge. In two cohorts of patients with cancer-associated VTE, the modified Ottawa score showed modest discriminating power and was unable to predict the risk of VTE recurrences (44, 45).

Diagnostic algorithms are frequently used to identify patients in whom pulmonary embolism (PE) can be ruled out without the use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). In a study of 3465 patients with suspected PE, the YEARS decision rule (based on three clinical items combined with two D-dimer cut-offs) yielded a 14% decrease in CTPA examinations compared to conventional strategies (Figure 3) with a negative predictive value of 99.4% (46). Whether negative CTPA is sufficient to exclude PE in patients with likely pretest probability is debated. Pulmonary embolism was excluded with CTPA in 37% of patients with likely clinical probability, and the 3-month VTE risk was 0.6%, indicating that a negative CTPA safely excludes PE in this patient group (47).

The prevalence of PE in patients presenting with syncope has been highly debated this year, following the PESIT trial, reported last year (39), describing a 17% rate of PE in syncope cases referred to emergency rooms, after excluding cases with evident aetiology. A meta-analysis including 6608 emergency department patients and 975 patients hospitalized for syncope reported a PE prevalence <1% (48). Two other studies reported a PE prevalence of 1.4% among patients with syncope (14, 49). Routine screening for PE in all patients presenting with syncope may not be justified.

The PEITHO trial investigated long-term prognosis in patients with intermediate-risk PE randomized to receive thrombolysis or placebo (50). Thrombolytic treatment did not decrease long-term mortality rates, persisting dyspnoea, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, or right ventricular dysfunction.

Conflict of interest
V.A.: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer/BMS Alliance, Sanofi. S.B.: none. L.M.: Bayer, Pfizer/BMS Alliance, Sanofi. H.S.: Amgen, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, B Braun, Philips and Cook Medical. M.V.: Bayer. M. De C.: Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbott Vascular, Philips-Volcano, Sanofi.

References

1. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, et al. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628 [Epub ahead of print].

2. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095

3. Lindholt JS, Søgaard R. Population screening and intervention for vascular disease in Danish men (VIVA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 2256–2265.

4. Anand SS, Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, et al. COMPASS Investigators. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable peripheral or carotid artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32409-1.

5. Moresoli P, Habib B, Reynier P, et al. Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2017; 48: 2150–2157.

6. Verma S, Mazer CD, Al-Omran M, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease: a subanalysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation 2017: doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032031 [Epub ahead of print].

7. Bonaca MP, Nault P, Giugliano RP, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with evolocumab and outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from the FOURIER Trial (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk). Circulation 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032235.

8. Krankenberg H, Zeller T, Ingwersen M, et al. Self-expanding versus balloon-expandable stents for iliac artery occlusive disease: the randomized ICE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 1694–1704.

9. Ott I, Cassese S, Groha P, et al. Randomized comparison of paclitaxel-eluting balloon and stenting versus plain balloon plus stenting versus directional atherectomy for femoral artery disease (ISAR-STATH). Circulation 2017; 135: 2218–2226.

10. Krishnan P, Faries P, Niazi K, et al. Stellarex drug-coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month outcomes from the randomized ILLUMENATE pivotal and pharmacokinetic studies. Circulation 2017; 136: 1102–1113.

11. Schroeder H, Werner M, Meyer DR, Reimer P, Krüger K, Jaff MR, Brodmann M; ILLUMENATE EU RCT Investigators. Low-dose paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: one-year results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon). Circulation 2017; 135: 2227–2236.

12. Weitz JI, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1211–1222.

13. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Julian JA, et al. ATTRACT Trial Investigators. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2240–2252.

14. Verma AA, Masoom H, Rawal S, Guo Y, Razak F. Investigators G. Pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in patients hospitalized with syncope: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 1046–1048.

15. Darmon A, Bhatt DL, Elbez Y, et al. External applicability of the COMPASS trial: an analysis of the reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) registry. Eur Heart J 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx658.

16. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. CANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644–657.

17. Freisinger E, Malyar NM, Reinecke H, et al. Impact of diabetes on outcome in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss: a large-scaled routine data analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16: 41.

18. Kolte D, Kennedy KF, Shishehbor MH, et al. Thirty-day readmissions after endovascular or surgical therapy for critical limb ischemia: analysis of the 2013 to 2014 nationwide readmissions databases. Circulation 2017; 136: 167–176.

19. Jaff MR, Nelson T, Ferko N, et al. Endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: a network meta-analysis of current technologies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28: 1617–1627.

20. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Guo Y, et al. Perioperative acute myocardial infarction associated with non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 2409–2417.

21. Shah Z, Masoomi R, Thapa R, et al. Optimal medical management reduces risk of disease progression and ischemic events in asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients: a long-term follow-up study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 44: 150–159.

22. Bennett KM, Scarborough JE. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events than carotid endarterectomy in female patients. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66: 794–801.

23. Rantner B, Kollerits B, Roubin GS, et al. Carotid Stenosis Trialists’ Collaboration. Early endarterectomy carries a lower procedural risk than early stenting in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: results from 4 randomized controlled trials. Stroke 2017; 48: 1580–1587.

24. Knappich C, Kuehnl A, Tsantilas P, et al. The use of embolic protection devices is associated with a lower stroke and death rate after carotid stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 1257–1265.

25. Venermo M, Wang G, Sedrakyan A, et al. Cronenwett J. Editor’s choice – carotid stenosis treatment: variation in international practice patterns. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 53: 511–519.

26. Saura D, Dulgheru R, Caballero L, et al. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic normal reference ranges for proximal aorta dimensions: results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 167–179.

27. Thomas IC, McClelland RL, Michos ED, et al. Density of calcium in the ascending thoracic aorta and risk of incident cardiovascular disease events. Atherosclerosis 2017; 265: 190–196.

28. Kim J, Budoff MJ, Nasir K, et al. Thoracic aortic calcium, cardiovascular disease events, and all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals with zero coronary calcium: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis 2017; 257: 1–8.

29. Ohyama Y, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Noda C, et al. Aortic arch pulse wave velocity assessed by magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Hypertension 2017; 70: 524–530.

30. Lescan M, Veseli K, Oikonomou A, et al. Aortic elongation and Stanford B dissection: the Tübingen Aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) Project. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54: 164–169.

31. Craiem D, El Batti S, Casciaro ME, et al. Age-related changes of thoracic aorta geometry used to predict the risk for acute type B dissection. Int J Cardiol 2017; 228: 654–660.

32. Ghulam QM1, Bredahl KK2, Lönn L, et al. Follow-up on small abdominal aortic aneurysms using three dimensional ultrasound: volume versus diameter. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;54:439–445.

33. Laine MT, Laukontaus SJ, Sund R, et al. A population-based study of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment in Finland 2000 to 2014. Circulation 2017;136:1726–1734.

34. Budtz-Lilly J, Venermo M, Debus S, et al. Assessment of international outcomes of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 9 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54: 13–20.

35. Tomee SM, Bastiaannet E, Schermerhorn ML, et al. The consequences of real life practice of early abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a cost-benefit analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54: 28–33.

36. Abraha I, Luchetta ML, De Florio R, et al. Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD010296.

37. Mazzolai L, Aboyans V, Ageno W, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: a joint consensus document from the European society of cardiology working groups of aorta and peripheral circulation and pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function. Eur Heart J 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx003.

38. Prandoni P, Vedovetto V, Ciammaichella M, et al. Residual vein thrombosis and serial D-dimer for the long-term management of patients with deep v enous thrombosis. Thromb Res 2017; 154: 35–41.

39. De Carlo M, Mazzolai L, Bossone E, et al. Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases. The year in cardiology 2016: peripheral circulation. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 1028–1033.

40. Rodger MA, Le Gal G, Anderson DR, et al. Investigators RIS. Validating the HERDOO2 rule to guide treatment duration for women with unprovoked venous thrombosis: multinational prospective cohort management study. BMJ 2017; 356: j1065.

41. Prandoni P, Ageno W, Mumoli N, et al. Recanalization rate in patients with proximal vein thrombosis treated with the direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2017; 153: 97–100.

42. Haig Y, Enden T, Grøtta O, et al. CaVenT Study Group. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3: e64–e71.

43. van Es N, Di Nisio M, Cesarman G, et al. Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Haematologica 2017; 102: 1494–1501.

44. Alatri A, Mazzolai L, Font C, et al. Low discriminating power of the modified Ottawa VTE risk score in a cohort of patients with cancer from the RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117: 1630–1636.

45. Alatri A, Mazzolai L, Kucher N, et al. The Modified Ottawa Score and Clinical Events in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis from the Swiss VTE Registry. Semin Thromb Hemost 2017; 43: 871–876.

46. van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, et al. del Sol AI. group Ys. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet 2017; 390: 289–297.

47. Robert-Ebadi H, Glauser F, Planquette B, et al. Safety of multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with a likely pretest clinical probability. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 1584–1590.

48. Oqab Z, Ganshorn H, Sheldon R. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with syncope. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.015.

49. Frizell A, Fogel N, Steenblik J, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Am J Emerg Med 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.090.

50. Konstantinides SV, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al. Impact of thrombolytic therapy on the long-term outcome of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 1536–1544.